In my opinion it remains to be seen whether the 400% flat modifier would work in this servers scenario, given that it is a pre-renewal formula. However I do like the idea alot especially if it avoids scenarios like in the video Aina posted. Here's my opinion.
Existing formula:
advantages: Makes CRS and burst damage builds legitimate, and makes top tier gear desirable.
disadvantages: Makes ungeared/low GX's very difficult to level or find any use for other than poison builds, and in parties sometimes forces you to resort to the backslide-yggdrasil leaf scheme which I'm getting too good at for my own liking.
Also makes top geared GX's more than legitimate, arguably overpowered.
Makes aspd builds pretty bad in my experience.
Pre-re formula:
Advantages: Gives all GX's a chance at being powerful and useful from a very early stage.
Makes aspd/crit builds legitimate, opening up a choice of builds that GX's can choose from, whether it is CI, CRS, spin, aspd, or poison builds. That is a big advantage imo, having the choice between several builds for GX is vital.
Should any blatant balance problems occur such as general OP-ness or generally underpowered, I assume that this flat % modifier can easily be adjusted.
Disadvantages: Remains to be seen if this would make top tier gear not worth the effort imo. In this case boosting GX specific high tier gears may be the only fix, making the server feel more "custom" which is often a bad thing.
And remains to be seen if this would cause unforeseen problems in the current renewal climate, given that this is a formula coming from 2nd class in a pre-re environment.
Hybrid custom formula:
Advantages: Could be the best of both worlds if the pre-re formula causes trivialization problems, combining a % modifier with the modern atk based boost.
Potentially the most balanced solution making things easier for new GX's yet still making top tier gear virtually as desirably as before.
Disadvantages: Could take allot of time and effort to create, test, balance and implement.
May not be necessary if pre-re formula doesn't cause any of the above problems.
Just some off the cuff opinions on this, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong about anything.
Edited by Scias, 28 January 2015 - 04:14 PM.